- 00000018WIA303AA970GYZ
- id_400230531.3
- Mar 30, 2022 1:31:21 PM
Measurement accuracy
The accuracy of on-view measurements depends on various factors, and, in particular, on the size of the ROI being measured. A typical MR acquisition has a DFOV from about 25 to about 48 cm. In the examples below, 25 mm is used.
| CAUTION | |
|---|---|
| CAUTION | |
|---|---|
Measurement resolution
The software calculates and displays measurements with a resolution of one decimal place (such as 0.1 mm, 0.1 degree, or 0.1 mm2). However, the real measurement accuracy is generally considerably less for a number of different reasons.
Geometrical accuracy
Geometric accuracy is limited by display resolution (pixel size). When four views are displayed, each view equals 512x512 pixels. With a DFOV of 25 cm, a pixel is equivalent to 0.5x0.5 mm, so you cannot place a measurement point with a precision better than this. As a result:
- For a distance measurement, the geometrical accuracy is equal to the displayed length +/- image pixel size.
- For an angle measurement, the geometrical accuracy is equal to the displayed angle value +/-10 degrees for an angle measured between segments which are five times larger than the image pixel size. Accuracy improves as the length of the segments increases.
- For an area measurement, the geometrical accuracy is equal to the displayed area value +/- the circumference of the region of interest multiplied by (image pixel size)2 / 2. Note the region-of-interest measurements and statistics are based on the pixels INSIDE the graphic defining the region.
The geometrical accuracy defines a lower bound on the overall accuracy that can be obtained. Further limiting factors are image set resolution, acquisition accuracy, display settings, and partial volume effects.
Image set resolution
The image set resolution is determined by the size of the FOV, the matrix, and the inter-slice distance.
In the acquisition plane, for a 25 cm FOV, the smallest detail in an image acquired with a 512x512 matrix will be about 0.5x0.5 mm. With a 256x256 matrix, the smallest detail will be 1x1 mm. In the acquisition plane, the measurement accuracy cannot be better than the size of the smallest element.
In the same way, the accuracy in a direction perpendicular to the acquisition plane cannot be better than the inter-slice distance.
| CAUTION | |
|---|---|
Acquisition accuracy
Any errors in the original image set resulting from the acquisition process (calibration, slice interpolation) will be added to the same extent to the measurement error.
As an example, the spatial accuracy of MR images can vary, depending on the patient, the pulse sequence, and the MR system itself. Metallic implants or air-bone interfaces may lead to susceptibility artifacts and spatial distortions greater than those observed when calibrating the system with a Quality Assurance phantom, even on a perfectly tuned MR system.
Display settings
Since anatomical features are rarely of a uniform density, the apparent dimension of an anatomical feature can change when you modify the display settings (window width and level), thereby adding another factor of uncertainty to an on-view measurement.
3D object measurements
You can measure voxel value, distance, angle, area, and total volume on the views. When dealing in 3D, the rules are a bit more complex. For instance, to measure a distance, you still need to place two points to define a line segment. But these two points can be placed at entirely different views in the 3D volume.
At all times, the views will only show the projection of the measurement (distance, angle, area) onto the plane of the views. The displayed measurement value, however, can be either the true three-dimensional measurement (3D mode) or the measurement of the projection (2D mode).
